Top Ten Facts & Double Deposits
May 1, 2008
Here’s a link to the New England Association for College Admissions Counseling’s
Top Ten Facts Students Should Know About The College Admissions Process.
www.neacac.org/docs/top_ten_facts.pdf
I learned about this great document through a NACAC discussion about “double depositing.” When a student submits an admission deposit to more than one college it is called double depositing. It is a problem for a number of reasons.
1) Lack of Honesty – The deposit is meant to tell a college the student intends to enroll in that college. It’s pretty hard to enroll in two or more colleges at once.
2) Waste of Money – Deposits are usually non-refundable, so if the student doesn’t enroll at a college to which they sent a deposit, they are likely to lose that money.
3) Risky Choice – If colleges find out that a student has made more than one deposit, the can rescind the student’s admission.
So, don’t double deposit!
But wait! What about the student who has been accepted at several colleges, but one or more of the colleges hasn’t finished their financial aid package? In this case the student should ask the college for an extension of the deposit deadline. And they shouldn’t double deposit. Many colleges are willing to extend the deadline if they need to if it results in a more accurate student count.
Entry Filed under: Admissions, Students. Tags: college admission, enrollment deposit.
1 Comment Add your own
Leave a comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Paul Lloyd Hemphill | May 2nd, 2008 at 1:39 am
The following is a link to a blog posting that was left as a comment to my Top Ten/Double Dep. posting. Rather than posting his entire page, you may use this link to read Mr. Hemphill’s ideas about double depositing. LINK HERE
I have a VERY strong disagreement with Mr. Hemphill’s post. If a family has money to burn, then his strategy may be not be “a distasteful and loathsome way to maneuver”, but in addition to being a financial burden to the vast majority of American families, it hurts other students who could have been taken off a waitlist, and it hurts colleges trying to plan for their incoming class. Perhaps Mr. Hemphill wrote this post as a tongue-in-cheek solution to the problem, but that’s not the way I read it.
MB 5/2/08